ANNOUNCEMENTS

ACHIEVEMENTS what CBCRA do in the community
BECOME A MEMBER and raise the level of community spirit
SEND US your suggestions and comments
READ MORE about City of Cape Town’s activities & policies
FAULT REPORT system introduced by the City Council
VISIT Property Valuations for more details about your CV22

Thursday 26 October 2023

Die Burger: Bouwerk in Kampsbaai draai in November in die hof 25 Oktober 2023

Artikel 25 Oktober 2024 in Die Burger deur Jana Breytenbach. ©netwerk24

Victoriaweg in Kampsbaai, Kaapstad, is sekerlik een van die gesogste plekke moontlik vir 'n hotelof restaurant.

Dit is waarom die maatskappy Mas Sam vroeër vanjaar R230 miljoen betaal het vir 'n erf waarvoor reeds voorheen goedkeuring gegee is dat dit herontwikkel kon word.

Kampsbaai se belastingsbetalersvereneging is egter nie hiermee geneë nie en is hof toe om die ontwikkeling te stuit....

Lees verder aan die artikel hieronder:







Thursday 5 October 2023

Beachfront Hotel - Help prevent the destruction & desecration of the Camps Bay beachfront

Herewith the APPLICANTS' HEADS OF ARGUMENT 8.11.23 on THE CAMPS BAY & CLIFTON RATEPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION & ANOTHER / THE CAMPS BAY BEACH HOTEL (PTY) LTD AND SIX OTHERS HIGH COURT CASE NO: 8640/2023

Please click on the link below to download the PDF (137 pages, 998kb)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sNKaxtAyzaOQ3_2ZgikVyIN2ZnOvLhny/view?usp=sharing


___________________________________________________________________________

Herewith the legal communication regarding the pending litigation challenge pertaining to the development of the proposed beachfront hotel:

Published on this blog 5 October 2023


Dear Sirs / Mesdames


THE CAMPS BAY & CLIFTON RATEPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION & ANOTHER / THE

CAMPS BAY BEACH HOTEL (PTY) LTD AND SIX OTHERS

HIGH COURT CASE NO: 8640/2023


1. We refer to the above and the pending litigation, wherein the Camps Bay & Clifton

Ratepayers’ Association challenges the legality of the City’s approval/s pertaining to

the development of a new hotel and restaurant building on the property known as Erf

3349 Camps Bay. This letter is addressed to you, at your specific request, to express

an opinion about your prospects of success in the pending litigation.


2. Firstly, we believe that you have a very good prospects of success. We are of the

respectful view that you should succeed to set aside the approval of the aforesaid

development. We shall proceed to set out, in short version below, some of the

primary reasons why we respectfully believe that you should succeed in Court.


3. The formal approval of the development was done on the basis that there should be

at least 120 (one hundred and twenty off-street) off-street parking bays provided for

the hotel and the restaurant. That approval went to the highest level and was also

the decision of the Executive Mayor of Cape Town (which is the highest planning

appeal authority in the City). Thereafter, in what appears to have been a form of

improper “off the record” (secret) meeting between the developer’s architect and 3

(three) planning officials of the City, they decided that the 120 (one hundred and

twenty) off-street parking bay requirement would not apply to this development. One

of these planning officials proceeded to recommend to the department dealing with

building plans that a building plan which only provided for 49 (forty-nine) parking

bays would suffice for the development. The building plan was approved on that

basis. Such approval was clearly unlawfully manipulated. To be lawfully approved, a

building plan must meet the requirements of the underlying planning approvals and

the law as it existed at the time that application was originally made for the planning

approval.


4. The municipal spatial development framework (“the MSDF”) of Cape Town

determines that a general height restriction of 10 (ten) metres applies to all buildings

across Camps Bay (since the imposition of that limitation). Item 190 of the City’s

Development Management Scheme (i.e. the zoning scheme regulations) stipulates

that no facade of any building in Camps Bay may exceed a height of 10 (ten) metres

above any specific point on the ground. The approved development of the hotel and

restaurant exceeds these limitations:


4.1 No height departure was granted to allow for a building which is higher than

10 (ten) meters.

4.2 The facades of the new building will be approximately 15 (fifteen) metres at

several points along the perimeter thereof, once constructed.

4.3 The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 16 of 2013 prohibits a

Municipal Planning Tribunal (“the MPT”) from approving any development

which is in conflict with the MSDF of a municipality. The MPT clearly breached

this statutory prohibition when it approved this development.

4.4 When the MPT approved the development, it set a maximum heights above

mean sea level for the new building. The approved building plans show that

this height limitation is exceeded.

4.5 A building plan cannot be approved which conflicts with existing law and/or the

underlying planning approvals for the development, as granted by the

Municipal Planning Tribunal (“the MPT”) and the Executive Mayor (as the

planning appeal authority).


5. Because the development is one for a hotel and restaurant, there are minimum

requirement applicable for loading bays to be provided. Such loading bays must be

of a minimum specific width and the headroom must also meet specific requirements

(to allow delivery vehicles which need larger bays to park). The approved building

plans show that only one loading bay is provided which does not meet either the

width or the headroom requirements. It is incomprehensible how a building plan for a

development of this nature could be approved, without proper provision being made

for deliveries. Hotels and restaurants require large numbers of deliveries on a daily

basis.


6. Also, there are minimum requirements which apply to a development of this nature

insofar as a refuse room is concerned. The amount of refuse produced by a hotel

and restaurant of this nature, will be enormous. The refuse room provided for this

development is far too small to accommodate the requirements of a hotel and

restaurant of this scale. There is no provision made for the sorting of refuse; only 24

(twenty-four) wheely bins can be accommodated; and the placing of the refuse room,

which is on a different level to the street, does not provide easy access to the street,

from which refuse removal is supposed to take place by the City. The Solid Waste

Department of the City did not support the approval of the building plans. Yet the

department responsible for the approval of building plans was informed, incorrectly,

that there was no objection to the draft building plans. Had the correct facts been

known, the building plans would not have been approved.


7. Victoria Road, which is the road onto which the hotel and restaurant will primarily

face, is a provincial main road. There is a 5 (five) meter building line set-back

applicable to that road. Only the Premier of the Western Cape can approve a setback

from the building line on Victoria Road. The Premier can legally do so, only

after plans are submitted to the Premier which show the purpose of the set-back and

the development. A relaxation of the building line was done by officials of the

provincial Department of Transport, who had no authority to do so, but even that

approval (on which the developer relies) lapsed years ago. Notwithstanding, the

building plan was approved with the support of the planning department of the City.

The department responsible for the approval of building plans was not made aware

of this legal requirement.


8. There are numerous other smaller technical requirements with which the building

plans and the planning approvals for the development did not comply. All these

issues are in the Court papers and will be argued when the matter does come before

the High Court for judicial review.


9. In short, based on the above, we are of the respectful view that you should succeed

before the High Court and that the development of the hotel and restaurant building

on Victoria Road, Camps Bay will not be allowed to proceed. The approval thereof

should be set aside and we are very positive about your prospects of success.

10. Please advise if you have any further questions.


Yours faithfully

VAN RENSBURG & CO

Per:

L J VAN RENSBURG


ATTORNEYS, NOTARIES, CONVEYANCERS, ADMINISTRATORS OF ESTATES

_____________________________________________________________________

PROKUREURS, NOTARISSE, AKTEVERVAARDIGERS, BOEDELBEREDDERAARS

Tel: (021) 713-2100 PO Box 249

Cell / Selfoon: 082-872-6340 BERGVLIET

7864

E-pos / E-mail: Leon@vrlegal.co.za 127 Main Road

BERGVLIET, 7945

Website: www.legalassistance.co.za /

www.vrlegal.co.za Datum / Date: 10/08/23

_______________________________________________________________

Director/Direkteur: Leon Jansen van Rensburg B.Juris, LLB, LLM, LLD (PU vir CHO)

Professional Assistants/Professionele Assistente: Vanessa Dean LLB (UNISA), Cornelia Jansen van Rensburg BA LLB (US)

Consultant/Konsultant: Sheila Camerer BA LLB (UCT)

U verw / Your ref:

Ons verw / Our ref: LJVR/pk/VRC0510

The Camps Bay & Clifton Ratepayers’ Association

CAMPS BAY

Via email: campsbayratepayers@gmail.com


___________________________________________________________________________




Below are links pertaining to the proposed beachfront hotel in Victoria Road. Please click on the links to access the pdf files:

BFH- Attorney Van Rensburg Letter to CBCRA re High Court prospects 2023-10-08.pdf

BFH- Founding Affidavit 2023-05-29.pdf

BFH- Founding Affidavit Supplementary1.pdf

BFH- Founding Affidavit Supplementary2.pdf

BFH- Answering Affidavit Developer MAS SAM 7th Respondent.pdf

BFH- Answering Affidavit Mayor Hill-Lewis 3rd respondent and CCT Mr Marx Mupariwa 2nd respondent.pdf

BFH- Answering Affidavit Minister Rural Development and Land Reform 6th Respondent.pdf

BFH- Replying Affidavit to 6th respondent Min Rural Dev and 7th respondent Developer MAS SAM.pdf

APPLICANTS' HEADS OF ARGUMENT 8.11.23



Beachfront Hotel - Help prevent the destruction & desecration of the Camps Bay beachfront

Beachfront Hotel - Help prevent the destruction & desecration of the Camps Bay beachfront

Herewith the APPLICANTS' HEADS OF ARGUMENT 8.11.23 on THE CAMPS BAY & CLIFTON RATEPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION & ANOTHER / THE CAMPS BAY BEACH HOTEL (PTY) LTD AND SIX OTHERS HIGH COURT CASE NO: 8640/2023

Please click on the link below to download the PDF (137 pages, 998kb)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sNKaxtAyzaOQ3_2ZgikVyIN2ZnOvLhny/view?usp=sharing

___________________________________________________________________________



Herewith the legal communication regarding the pending litigation challenge pertaining to the development of the proposed beachfront hotel:

Published on this blog 5 October 2023


Dear Sirs / Mesdames


THE CAMPS BAY & CLIFTON RATEPAYERS’ ASSOCIATION & ANOTHER / THE

CAMPS BAY BEACH HOTEL (PTY) LTD AND SIX OTHERS

HIGH COURT CASE NO: 8640/2023


1. We refer to the above and the pending litigation, wherein the Camps Bay & Clifton

Ratepayers’ Association challenges the legality of the City’s approval/s pertaining to

the development of a new hotel and restaurant building on the property known as Erf

3349 Camps Bay. This letter is addressed to you, at your specific request, to express

an opinion about your prospects of success in the pending litigation.


2. Firstly, we believe that you have a very good prospects of success. We are of the

respectful view that you should succeed to set aside the approval of the aforesaid

development. We shall proceed to set out, in short version below, some of the

primary reasons why we respectfully believe that you should succeed in Court.


3. The formal approval of the development was done on the basis that there should be

at least 120 (one hundred and twenty off-street) off-street parking bays provided for

the hotel and the restaurant. That approval went to the highest level and was also

the decision of the Executive Mayor of Cape Town (which is the highest planning

appeal authority in the City). Thereafter, in what appears to have been a form of

improper “off the record” (secret) meeting between the developer’s architect and 3

(three) planning officials of the City, they decided that the 120 (one hundred and

twenty) off-street parking bay requirement would not apply to this development. One

of these planning officials proceeded to recommend to the department dealing with

building plans that a building plan which only provided for 49 (forty-nine) parking

bays would suffice for the development. The building plan was approved on that

basis. Such approval was clearly unlawfully manipulated. To be lawfully approved, a

building plan must meet the requirements of the underlying planning approvals and

the law as it existed at the time that application was originally made for the planning

approval.


4. The municipal spatial development framework (“the MSDF”) of Cape Town

determines that a general height restriction of 10 (ten) metres applies to all buildings

across Camps Bay (since the imposition of that limitation). Item 190 of the City’s

Development Management Scheme (i.e. the zoning scheme regulations) stipulates

that no facade of any building in Camps Bay may exceed a height of 10 (ten) metres

above any specific point on the ground. The approved development of the hotel and

restaurant exceeds these limitations:


4.1 No height departure was granted to allow for a building which is higher than

10 (ten) meters.

4.2 The facades of the new building will be approximately 15 (fifteen) metres at

several points along the perimeter thereof, once constructed.

4.3 The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 16 of 2013 prohibits a

Municipal Planning Tribunal (“the MPT”) from approving any development

which is in conflict with the MSDF of a municipality. The MPT clearly breached

this statutory prohibition when it approved this development.

4.4 When the MPT approved the development, it set a maximum heights above

mean sea level for the new building. The approved building plans show that

this height limitation is exceeded.

4.5 A building plan cannot be approved which conflicts with existing law and/or the

underlying planning approvals for the development, as granted by the

Municipal Planning Tribunal (“the MPT”) and the Executive Mayor (as the

planning appeal authority).


5. Because the development is one for a hotel and restaurant, there are minimum

requirement applicable for loading bays to be provided. Such loading bays must be

of a minimum specific width and the headroom must also meet specific requirements

(to allow delivery vehicles which need larger bays to park). The approved building

plans show that only one loading bay is provided which does not meet either the

width or the headroom requirements. It is incomprehensible how a building plan for a

development of this nature could be approved, without proper provision being made

for deliveries. Hotels and restaurants require large numbers of deliveries on a daily

basis.


6. Also, there are minimum requirements which apply to a development of this nature

insofar as a refuse room is concerned. The amount of refuse produced by a hotel

and restaurant of this nature, will be enormous. The refuse room provided for this

development is far too small to accommodate the requirements of a hotel and

restaurant of this scale. There is no provision made for the sorting of refuse; only 24

(twenty-four) wheely bins can be accommodated; and the placing of the refuse room,

which is on a different level to the street, does not provide easy access to the street,

from which refuse removal is supposed to take place by the City. The Solid Waste

Department of the City did not support the approval of the building plans. Yet the

department responsible for the approval of building plans was informed, incorrectly,

that there was no objection to the draft building plans. Had the correct facts been

known, the building plans would not have been approved.


7. Victoria Road, which is the road onto which the hotel and restaurant will primarily

face, is a provincial main road. There is a 5 (five) meter building line set-back

applicable to that road. Only the Premier of the Western Cape can approve a setback

from the building line on Victoria Road. The Premier can legally do so, only

after plans are submitted to the Premier which show the purpose of the set-back and

the development. A relaxation of the building line was done by officials of the

provincial Department of Transport, who had no authority to do so, but even that

approval (on which the developer relies) lapsed years ago. Notwithstanding, the

building plan was approved with the support of the planning department of the City.

The department responsible for the approval of building plans was not made aware

of this legal requirement.


8. There are numerous other smaller technical requirements with which the building

plans and the planning approvals for the development did not comply. All these

issues are in the Court papers and will be argued when the matter does come before

the High Court for judicial review.


9. In short, based on the above, we are of the respectful view that you should succeed

before the High Court and that the development of the hotel and restaurant building

on Victoria Road, Camps Bay will not be allowed to proceed. The approval thereof

should be set aside and we are very positive about your prospects of success.

10. Please advise if you have any further questions.


Yours faithfully

VAN RENSBURG & CO

Per:

L J VAN RENSBURG


ATTORNEYS, NOTARIES, CONVEYANCERS, ADMINISTRATORS OF ESTATES

_____________________________________________________________________

PROKUREURS, NOTARISSE, AKTEVERVAARDIGERS, BOEDELBEREDDERAARS

Tel: (021) 713-2100 PO Box 249

Cell / Selfoon: 082-872-6340 BERGVLIET

7864

E-pos / E-mail: Leon@vrlegal.co.za 127 Main Road

BERGVLIET, 7945

Website: www.legalassistance.co.za /

www.vrlegal.co.za Datum / Date: 10/08/23

_______________________________________________________________

Director/Direkteur: Leon Jansen van Rensburg B.Juris, LLB, LLM, LLD (PU vir CHO)

Professional Assistants/Professionele Assistente: Vanessa Dean LLB (UNISA), Cornelia Jansen van Rensburg BA LLB (US)

Consultant/Konsultant: Sheila Camerer BA LLB (UCT)

U verw / Your ref:

Ons verw / Our ref: LJVR/pk/VRC0510

The Camps Bay & Clifton Ratepayers’ Association

CAMPS BAY

Via email: campsbayratepayers@gmail.com


Below are links pertaining to the proposed beachfront hotel in Victoria Road. Please click on the links to access the pdf files:

BFH- Attorney Van Rensburg Letter to CBCRA re High Court prospects 2023-10-08.pdf

BFH- Founding Affidavit 2023-05-29.pdf

BFH- Founding Affidavit Supplementary1.pdf

BFH- Founding Affidavit Supplementary2.pdf

BFH- Answering Affidavit Developer MAS SAM 7th Respondent.pdf

BFH- Answering Affidavit Mayor Hill-Lewis 3rd respondent and CCT Mr Marx Mupariwa 2nd respondent.pdf

BFH- Answering Affidavit Minister Rural Development and Land Reform 6th Respondent.pdf

BFH- Replying Affidavit to 6th respondent Min Rural Dev and 7th respondent Developer MAS SAM.pdf

APPLICANTS' HEADS OF ARGUMENT 8.11.23

____________________________________________________________________

 HELP PREVENT THE DESTRUCTION & DESECRATION OF THE CAMPS BAY BEACHFRONT



The proposed new 101-room hotel on the beachfront has been approved by the City with 5 floors instead of the permitted 3 and a height of almost 15m instead of the permitted 10m! This is a disgrace on the part of the City, which, sadly, routinely approves such inappropriate development.

It also fills the entire site, with no side spaces on the boundaries, and is critically short of parking bays.

The development has no environmental permission and there are many other contraventions which have been established by the Camps Bay & Clifton Ratepayers Association (CBCRA) and its legal team. 

As happened with the development at 22 Sedgemoor Rd, the developer and City tell us that the planning approval is all in order!

In the Sedgemoor matter, the High Court disagreed and interdicted any further work on the site in December 2021 (14 months ago) and that remains the current status – and will continue so until the developer is prepared to negotiate a solution that is acceptable to the neighbours and the community.

The CBCRA has a proven track record of stopping inappropriate development in Camps Bay for the benefit of all current and future owners of property and residents.

The CBCRA has, over the past few years, repeatedly opposed and appealed the decision-making of the City in this beachfront hotel matter – forcing it into many questionable planning decisions in order to favour the development. The City is notorious for its blind “development at any cost” stance.

The community gave generously toward this fight - and enabled the CBCRA to get to this juncture where every move by the City or developer is recorded and can be placed before a High Court judge for a review of those objectionable decisions. The CBCRA will soon make that application to the High Court to review and set aside the City’s planning decision to approve this monstrous blight on the built environment of one of the most beautiful areas in the world.

We need to stand up against the abuse of power by the City which feeds the greed of developers!

The community is not anti-development but insists that it must be sensitive and sustainable and within the development rules for the area – everything which this development is not!

From the above perspective, it is clear that this insensitive over-bulked monstrosity will even block the view of the mountain from the beach! Note how it towers over the existing Tigers Milk building from the side and the back.

We call on the community to stand together and back the CBCRA and local residents opposing the wholesale destruction of one of the most beautiful and visited beachfronts in the world – both financially and by joining the movement to ensure sensitive and appropriate development along the beachfront.

Please contact campsbayratepayers@gmail.com to offer your assistance and be included in our mailing address. Together, we can bring some sense back to the development of the beachfront and Camps Bay.

The CBCRA banking details are:

Bank First National Bank
Branch Code 201709
Account No 62550213400
Reference YOUR NAME and Beachfront Hotel

CBCRA
(Camps Bay & Clifton Ratepayers Association)
Tel: 083 653 6363
E-mail: campsbayratepayers@gmail.com
Blog: http://campsbayratepayers.blogspot.com