CBRRA
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING MINUTES
HELD AT The Rotunda, The Bay Hotel, Camps Bay, 7 September 2015 @ 18:50
1. WELCOME
The Chair welcomed everyone. He thanked Maree Brink and the Bay Hotel who are always most generous with their hospitality – and special thanks here to Events co-ordinator, Grant and his team, for all of the arrangements.
HELD AT The Rotunda, The Bay Hotel, Camps Bay, 7 September 2015 @ 18:50
1. WELCOME
The Chair welcomed everyone. He thanked Maree Brink and the Bay Hotel who are always most generous with their hospitality – and special thanks here to Events co-ordinator, Grant and his team, for all of the arrangements.
He also thanked Mary and Brian Lloyd who man the
membership table, for their tireless efforts.
He welcomed the guest speakers, Dr Jo Barnes, Rogeria Viana and Tommy van
Zyl.
We were expecting Councillor Marga Haywood, but
she wasn’t present. Our other Cllr, Jacques Weber sent his apologies and could
make it due to bereavement in his family. It would have been informative to
have Jacques at the meeting but circumstances dictated otherwise.
2. APOLOGIES,
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
2.1. Apologies: Brenda Getz, Paddy Walker, Chair CBOA, Tony & Pru Hare, Ann Caras, Trudi Groenewald
2.1. Apologies: Brenda Getz, Paddy Walker, Chair CBOA, Tony & Pru Hare, Ann Caras, Trudi Groenewald
2.2. Announcements: Since our last Public Meeting on 13 April
2015, I must report that, sadly, 2 of our members have passed away. Arthur
Shephard, whose endeavours and dedication to all matters Camps Bay – but
particularly the Little Glen project – will be greatly missed for his wonderful
personality and tireless efforts on behalf of this community. The CBRRA has
proposed that the Little Glen be renamed in his honour and the process is
underway with the City. The last that we heard from the City was that a
petition would also be required over and above the CBRRA motivation. Alma Horn
is dealing with this matter and will inform the community as she receives info
from the City. An extremely
well-attended celebration of Arthur’s life was held at this venue a couple of
months ago.
Sadly, I must also inform you that
Gavin McArthur, born, raised and until recently, a long time resident of CB and
member of the CBRRA passed away last week after a long fight with illness.
Gavin was very supportive of CBRRA and used to arrange for our printing
requirements – especially the street posters when we still used them. Hamba
Kahle old friend and our sincere condolences to his sister, Ann Caras, who has
also served the CBRRA Manco tirelessly over the years.
On a happier note, albeit a
bittersweet one, I must report that John Powell, after over 30 years of
dedicated service to this community through the CBRRA has decided to retire. It
would be impossible to even begin to describe the incredible effort that John
has put into the preservation and progress of this community. Most of the hard
work was unsung and often unnoticed but that didn’t deter John from pursuing
the cause.
I will place a more detailed CV of
John’s achievements on the blog shortly but we wish John and his wife Kay a
long and happy retirement and remain in their debt forever. To make sure that
he doesn’t slow down in his retirement, John has recently undergone a hip
replacement operation and I’m happy to report that all is going well and John
should be beetling around soon.
2.3. Minutes for AGM held 4 August 2014 was posted on the blog. These were proposed by Alma Horn and seconded
by Byron Herbert. No one objected. Minutes were approved.
3. CHAIR’S REPORT
3. CHAIR’S REPORT
We have 2 of the most serious matters in CBRRA
history to report on tonight, viz:
The proposed Clifton Development and the quality
of the seawater in Camps Bay, with particular reference to the latest
application by the City to continue with its marine outfall systems, which are
basically in Hout Bay, CB and Mouille Point. These 2 matters, particularly in
terms of bulk services, are intertwined.
So, we have a busy meeting tonight and I would
also like to touch on the recent ruling out of the WC High Court in the bowling
club/prep school matter.
It is also our AGM, so we will be asking for
nominations from the floor for people to serve on Manco. All volunteers are
welcome and a working knowledge of planning and the legal requirements thereto
will be an added bonus. So please make yourselves available when we call for
nominations.
3.1 Manco: All 10 members currently on the Manco have
indicated their willingness to continue on the committee, for which the
community should be very grateful. However – and as always at our public
meetings – we need to encourage more people to volunteer their time for this
essential civic function.
Manco is made up of the following members:
Chris Willemse (Chair) - Ward
Committee (74) and Planning
Richard Bendel (Vice Chair)
- Membership and Finance
Brenda Herbert - Planning and Events
and CPF
Johan van Papendorp – Planning &
Environmental
Gus Millner - Membership
Alma Horn - Membership and PR
Helet Merkling - Clifton
Byron Herbert - Beach and Dog walking
Neil Gardner – Planning
Eban Tucker – Local affairs
The Chair asked for people to indicate their
willingness to stand for Manco election.
None forthcoming.
3.2 Advertising
for meetings: We would also like to ascertain how the community reacts to
our advertising:
Posters: This is quite a process. No one supported this costly and
time-consuming way of communicating.
Surface mail: Not needed.
E-mail: Majority at meeting because of e-mail.
3.3 Time
of meeting: The turn out for such an
important meeting was considered poor.
Although the meeting was scheduled to start at 6.30 pm, we did only
start at 6.55 pm. It is unclear what the
best time to start the meeting is, but it was proposed to start at 7 pm in
future.
4. THE
SEAWATER QUALITY IN CAMPS BAY (PRESENTED BY PROF JO BARNES)
The City was
recently required by the DEA, in terms of the Integrated Coastal Management
Act, to obtain a permit to discharge raw sewage through its various marine
outfall stations along the Atlantic seaboard.
Of course, this has been occurring for years now despite the protests
from academics in this field and environmentalists. However, the public participation process
that this requires has focused the community’s attention on this matter and I’m
delighted to welcome Dr Jo Barnes to address this issue and alert you to the
dangers and reality of sewage being pumped into the bay of Camps Bay. Dr Jo Barnes is an epidemiologist and senior
lecturer in Community Health at the Stellenbosch University Faculty of Health
Sciences. Dr Barnes, who is, amongst others, a recipient of the Order of the
Disa of the Western Cape Province, and an associate of the SU Water Institute. Dr Barnes, I thank you for giving of your
valuable time to address us tonight.
Dr Barnes gave a
very heartfelt presentation reflecting the plight of our seawater. Attached hereto is her Powerpoint
presentation.
She stressed that
sewage should be treated before it is pumped into the sea.
In Cape Town we have
many small treatment plants.
We must make a noise
and put pressure on Council to do the right thing and treat the sewage
properly.
5. AFRIFORUM (TOMMY VAN ZYL – CHAIR)
He spoke about what Afriforum is and
what they do, namely fight government and local municipalities on things they
aren’t doing properly (eg sewage). They
have been successful in most of the cases they have taken on.
He urged us to support them in their
fights against government and municipalities.
6. CLEANING OF CAMPS BAY BEACH (ROGERIA
VIANA – MD BEACH CLEAN SERVICES SA)
He discussed the
correct methods that should be used for cleaning the beaches (which they do)
and the benefits of these methods.
Their contract with
the City of Cape Town was terminated prematurely and is now subject to
litigation. All litigation details to
date are on their website www.beachclean.co.za.
At the moment, the
Camps Bay beach isn’t being cleaned properly with the correct machines which
could have major health implications.
7. PROPOSED
CLIFTON DEVELOPMENT (CHRIS WILLEMSE)
We would like to
have heard from Cllr Weber on this matter, but unfortunately he was unable to
attend the meeting. So The Chair had to
present.
I’m sure that many
here tonight are keen to be updated on the proposed Clifton development. I want to preface my remarks, and those of
other CBRRA Manco members, with the following:
The CBRRA is not a political organization. It is a civic-based
association, which deals with local and City matters on behalf of the community
constituency, which gives it its mandate.
However, having said
that, the CBRRA has to deal with the City on a daily basis – both the political
representatives and parties, and the officials – and it is therefore our duty
to report back to you as to how these interactions are or have proceeded. And whereas we have very good relations with
the City on a number of fronts, when it comes to property, land usage and
planning decisions, we are finding it extremely difficult to deal with the
DA-led administration of the City. We are finding that the commitment to
transparency and due process appears to be merely lip service and a box-ticking
exercise. Whilst Mayor de Lille and her deputy Ian Neilson tell all and sundry
that all processes are above board, we are discovering a clever network of
manipulation that is intended to serve the DA and their friends in the
development industry – all at the expense of the citizens of CT. Now this is
clearly a bold statement, so allow me to give a few examples:
1.
An application was made recently for
a large restaurant in Noordhoek. This application was opposed by the local
ratepayers and recommended for refusal by both the officials and the political
committee (the SPELUM committee). So it should have ended there. But no,
disregarding the entire specialist input and concerns of the community, Mayor
de Lille simply authorised the project using her executive power. This is how
the system now works! The attempted development of the Philippi Horticultural
Area is another example.
2.
The mayor’s attempted manipulation of
the Bowling Club/ Prep School matter had to be overturned by a High Court
judge. We’ll deal with the merits of the case shortly, but it has to be
unacceptable that a high court judge finds that the Mayor and her mayoral
committee take decisions that are unconstitutional, unreasonable and basically
ill-considered – whilst ignoring due process. Obviously, one’s reactions to
politicians are ultimately decided at the voting booth but we have to deal with
what is there and it is important that we make it clear to this administration
that we will not tolerate their obfuscations that are all intended to deprive
the citizens of CT of their rightful amenities – whether it is the Princess
Vlei debacle (where the City had to back down in the face of public outrage) or
the City’s land grab at the bowling club or this latest high rolling attempt to
turn a protected piece of scarce public open space land into a playground for the
rich.
The City presented
its plan at our last meeting and the residents voted unanimously to reject the
proposal. Since then, there have been separate local meetings with the CBRRA,
the Glen CC, the High School, the CPF, Clifton Tennis etc.
And every time the
plan changes, and becomes a larger proposal…
In print and on air,
Deputy Mayor Neilson has informed the citizens of Cape Town that the City is
listening to the community and, in fact, implementing the recommendations. This
is highly surprising, as these comments were made before either the CBRRA or
the CBOA had responded to any proposal. For public participation, read “the
City will now tell you what and how it’s going to happen”.
I will try to
explain what is happening and what the concerns are with this project:
Firstly, as you
probably all know, the City intends selling off the piece of land from the
ridge in Clifton to Glen Beach for private development – about 7,5ha. The
initial reasons given were that the buildings were dilapidated and that the residents
needed additional garaging. To unpack
this, let me confirm that the major building on the land is the Glen CC and
that it is in exceptional condition – with major money annually spent by that
club on on-going maintenance. As to the parking garages used by Clifton
residents, they are in a terrible state of disrepair – but the City owns these
structures and is responsible for the maintenance! And, the CBOA has been requesting their
upgrade for over 10 years – all to no
avail. More importantly, the CBOA have confirmed that they have not requested
additional garages, just the repairs to the existing. There has certainly not
been any request the existing 60 garages to be upgraded to an almost 800
parking bay garage. To put this in perspective, the Gardens Centre, which is a
massive centre, has 600 parking bays.
Secondly, the public
participation process is simply a sham. No matter what input is made, the
proposal just grows and grows. The City is conducting a box ticking exercise
and the lack of transparency is disgraceful, in our opinion.
Thirdly, the City is
extremely vague on how it proposes to sell off the land. It can do it 2 ways,
both with problems. On the one hand, it
can simply sell the land as is, encumbered with its current zoning and restrictions.
That’s easy enough but obviously the land will realize a fraction of its real
value. Also, the City will then be judge and jury over the re-zoning process
from which it stands to make millions of Rands in terms of rates etc. This is
also a process that could lead to wholescale corruption. On the other hand, the City could go through
all due processes and have the land zoned and entitled to the proposed
development. The problem that the City faces with this option is that the legal
processes might reject the proposal in the first instance – remembering that
this is an independently conducted, professional, public process. So the City
is not very keen on that option and keeps repeating that the EIA, TIA, Heritage
studies and all the other processes “will be done in due course”. It is almost
incredible that the City did not start this whole process with those
assessments. In fact, without the findings of these studies, asking for a
public participation process is flawed in the first place. How do you make
sensible suggestions when you are not in possession of all of the facts! It is
like saying that you must give your opinion on a proposal and then being given
a blank page! It is imperative that the
City embarks upon all necessary investigations and assessments and then proceed
with the public participation process. Not
only is the only sensible and legitimate approach, if the this process does
result in the land being sold for development, the City can realize about R850m
more for the land, which is not bad for a couple of million rand spent on the
process! But do remember, once the land
is sold off, it’s not ours anymore and anything can happen on the land. A
further implication is that once sold, the private developer can, if
unsuccessful with the rezoning application, simply let the land go to rack and
ruin. This will then be ideal for squatters to move in, which puts pressure
back on the ratepayers to agree to anything that the developer requests. This
is, of course, an old strategy.
Lastly, and also
very importantly, how will the City manage the development phase of this
proposal if it does indeed go ahead? How
will they compel the new owner of a piece of land - that they sold – to follow
the envisaged proposal? The City cannot even keep to its current Zoning scheme
regulations and routinely gives departures from the Scheme despite the protests
of neighbours and civics. Every bungalow on Clifton, Glen Beach and Bakoven has
a unique Maximum Development Envelope (MDE) registered over it – by the City.
And every month applications are approved by the City to amend these MDE’s. In
fact, a group of owners in Bakoven have launched a High Court challenge against
one such decision in Beta Rd, Bakoven, which has resulted in our councilors in
the local Good Hope Sub council being at loggerheads with each other. Read the
latest Mail and Guardian to find out more about this. In any event, it would be
practically impossible to control every building on the land, so once the land
is sold, whatever the developer wants to do, will in all likelihood happen. And
that’s not good for the environment.
At the last chaotic
meeting that the City attempted to hold at the High School (without proper
notice being given in terms of the law), a very prominent developer stood up and
said of the architectural plans for this proposal: “It all looks very good but
it will never be developed this way” – in other words, the developer will
change things to suit financial viability and the City will wring its hands and
tell us that it is private land now and due process must follow; which is its
way of telling us that it will approve whatever the developer wants regardless
of public input, as happens at every Subcouncil meeting, Spelum meeting and
Mayoral meeting on a monthly basis. Can
one really expect this leopard to change its spots ???
There is a further
aspect of this proposal that needs to be aired in terms of the entire city and
its many groupings. The City has strongly defended itself against the
allegation that Maidens’ Cove will no longer be accessible to the many
previously discriminated against citizens of this city and for which it has
such a strong heritage and meaning. So,
and I simply put this to you, about 34 bungalows costing about R40m each are
going to be built on the perimeter of a picnic and braai area that offers free
access to the public. Really, how long do you think that will last?
SO WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THIS?
The CBRRA and the
CBOA are strategizing a meaningful opposition to this proposal. We are joined
by many other groupings and civics across the City.
The CBRRA has opened
a bank account, which is dedicated to this opposition and any necessary
litigation that may follow. The account allows for donations to be tax
deductible and the details will go onto the BlogSpot. Just Google
campsbayratepayers and you’ll get there.
If we want to
preserve our precious resources of public space and amenity, we have to get
involved. We’re up against big money developers and a political party that is
largely sponsored by that industry.
But we have right on
our side and the united voice of the people always triumphs in the end! But a
certain amount of money is required to achieve this.
And our objective:
To ensure that the land remains in the hands of its citizens, ratepayers and
tourists to enjoy as it was intended – an unspoilt recreational and sporting
area. We have also had offers from various professional architectural teams
that see this area as a formal park – in line with the beautiful Green Point
Park on the Common. Now that is a worthwhile vision and one of which we should
all get behind.
The
website is SOSClifton.org.
8. CAMPS BAY BOWLING CLUB / PREP SCHOOL
(PRESENTED BY CHRIS WILLEMSE)
The Camps Bay Prep School expansion
onto the bowling club land has been discussed extensively over the past few
years and raised at our previous public meetings. There has been quite a lot of
activity in this matter recently, mainly the judgment that came out of the WC
High Court a few weeks back.
Basically, the City had approved a
decision by the Mayor to summarily cancel the Club’s lease and allow the school
to use the land for sporting purposes (note, not educational purposes, as this
would require a re-zoning). The Club applied to the court to have this decision
reviewed and set aside. The court found in the favour of the Club, with you,
the ratepayers, picking up the tab for the costs incurred by the City.
The judge ruled that the City had
acted in an unconstitutional and ultra vires (beyond its own powers) manner,
ignored due process and basically messed up on many fronts. This is disgraceful
– poor decision-making is one thing but being unable to act within the law is
another.
And it boils down to one issue again.
The City want the land to sell off for development, so what better way than to
give it to the school for a restricted, non-renewable period and then sell off
the land (rezoned by others away from public space) to a developer. We will
ultimately lose all our space – the bowling club, tennis courts and soccer
fields – if we do not stand up to the rapacious development policies of this
City.
This issue, as the CBRRA has been
saying for years now, must be resolved by a workable agreement between the
school and the sporting club. This agreement must have the support of the
community and should then be taken to the City as a sensible, sustainable and
proper solution to which the City will have to give a secure lease that is
renewable and of sufficient term to be reasonable.
The CBRRA will continue to facilitate
this process with the relevant parties.
9. CAMPS BAY DRIVE ROADWORKS UPDATE
(PRESENTED BY RICHARD BENDEL)
Richard Bendel read
from an e-mail provided by Ian Bowker who works for the City and is heading
this project
“Full completion on the Ravensteyn to Fiskaal section is
expected on 23 October – this means we will open that section up to give access
via Woodford etc. Full completion on Geneva to Prima expected on 24 October –
stop go will then be removed.
This means both these sections will be completed a month before
the expected completion date of 21 November and will help with access, but,
unfortunately, a month later than our original mid-September date. The reasons
for this were given previously, but to recap, the heritage issues causes a
month delay and the unexpectedly poor existing ground conditions, which
required additional excavation throughout the length of the road also added a
month.
400m of the 600 to 700m of subsoil drain have been completed in
the Rontree to Houghton Section. They expect the drains to be completed by 11
September, after which they can see if any further remedial work is required.
If not, which I believe (hopefully) will be the case, the road works will
continue as fast as they can. Until we are sure all the drainage issues are
sorted we are not 100% sure how long this section will take. That’s not
particularly helpful or informative, I know, and I Apologise. I will work on
the worst case and say that this section has now become our critical path that
will determine final completion, i.e. it may still take until November to
complete.”
While this is both
good and bad news, it is felt that the long-term benefits are well worth the
short term pain.
10. FINANCE
(PRESENTED BY RICHARD BENDEL)
Richard Bendel presented the signed audited Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014. The following main points were discussed:
Richard Bendel presented the signed audited Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014. The following main points were discussed:
7.1 The association had cash (its only asset)
of R281 820.
7.2 The liabilities were R416 304 of which
the provision for legal fees of R384 074 was the most significant.
7.3 The
association was accordingly technically insolvent in that the liabilities
exceed the assets.
7.4 The
provision for legal fees comprised R384 074 relating to the Harrison
matter (R294 074 awarded to City of Cape Town (this amount has been taxed) and
R90 000 to Harrison (this is an estimate)).
7.5 The
association was has been in discussions with City of Cape Town in order to come
to some settlement regarding this liability owed to it. This has resulted in the City agreeing to
payment of R60 000 per annum until the full amount (including interest)
has been paid. R150 000 of the
R294 094 has already been paid subsequent to the balance sheet date.
7.6 On
the trading side, there were 158 fully paid up Members that contributed R91 328
for the current year.
7.7 Apart
from the legal fees expense reflected in the Income Statement, the next biggest
expense was printing, postage & stationery of R10 210.
11. QUESTIONS / FROM THE FLOOR
11.1 Clifton: Traffic is a
key issue as to the suitability of the proposed development. We should employ suitable professionals. Per The Chair, EIA, Traffic and heritage are
all key issues. Helet Merkeling made a
passionate plea for funds to build up a war chest to fight Council. Council wants to de-classify the National
Monument and Clifton Scenic Reserve. We
need to do whatever we can to make sure the land isn’t sold since once sold, it
is GONE FOREVER.
12. GENERAL
The Chair thanked everyone for coming and declared the meeting closed.
MEETING CLOSED AT 20:55
The Chair thanked everyone for coming and declared the meeting closed.
MEETING CLOSED AT 20:55
