ANNOUNCEMENTS

ACHIEVEMENTS what CBCRA do in the community
BECOME A MEMBER and raise the level of community spirit
SEND US your suggestions and comments
READ MORE about City of Cape Town’s activities & policies
FAULT REPORT system introduced by the City Council
VISIT Property Valuations for more details about your CV22

Thursday, 12 May 2016



https://www.atlanticsun.co.za/news/new-environmental-policy-on-the-horizon-5169487

- by Matthew Hirsch

The City of Cape Town’s new environmental policy, which is set to be adopted by full council, has been labelled as a smokescreen by the Camps Bay Ratepayers’ Association.
The item was on the agenda at Sub-council 16 on April 18 and is set to be discussed at various ward committees before going to full council.
Johan van der Merwe, the City’s Mayco member for energy, environmental and spatial planning, said the new environmental strategy is in line with the National Strategy on Sustainable Development, which understands that the economy and society is dependent upon the natural environment, rather than seeing the economy, society, and the environment as competing needs to be balanced against each other.
“This is an important perspective shift as it recognises that the city is dependent on its natural environment to provide vital goods and services,” said Mr Van der Merwe.
But Chris Willemse, chairperson of the Camps Bay Residents’ and Ratepayers’ Association, pointed to the controversial Maiden’s Cove development. The plan to sell off or lease a portion of City-owned land, which included some of Maiden’s Cove, was first announced last year. In March, the City invited tenders to three portions of land in Clifton despite multiple objections from civic organisations and residents across the city.
“Until (the City) administration ceases to steal public open land for private development, any policy is just a smokescreen for a political party to enrich its sponsors and itself – as we have seen with the Maiden’s Cove development and the selling off of the Philippi Horticultural Area.”
Luke Stevens, vice chairperson of the Green Point Residents’ and Ratepayers’ Association, said protecting the natural environment was important in a time of increasing densification.
“Constant growth creates constantly increasing pressure on space, energy and management resources. We need education, invention and incentive to generate and apply innovations that resolve these constraints. Environmental policy needs to remain at the top of the agenda right across local government,” said Mr Stevens.
Mr Van der Merwe said the new strategy takes a principle-based approach rather than a sector-based approach.
Principles in the City’s new environmental policy include:
* Realising economic and social benefits;
* Preventing, minimising, and mitigating environmental impacts;
* Working towards resource efficiency;
* Promoting and implementing environmentally sensitive and low-impact urban design;
* Ensuring that residents are educated and empowered, and
* Ensuring the protection of natural and cultural heritage.
He said that the policy was important for the City. “The natural environment is an irreplaceable asset that provides a myriad ecosystem, goods and services, and a host of associated economic and social benefits, to the residents of Cape Town. Most importantly, Cape Town’s natural environment is a common asset belonging to all residents of Cape Town, which must remain accessible and deliver benefits to all – both current and future generations.
“In order to ensure that this asset is sustainable and effectively protected and managed, it is necessary to have an up-to-date and comprehensive environmental strategy and associated policies, plans, and other tools in place.”
City Bowl ward councillor, Dave Bryant, who was at the sub-council meeting when the policy was discussed, said Cape Town was unique with a nature reserve located in the middle of the city. “The natural environment is one of our key drivers of tourism and must be protected and maintained for future generations to come,” he said.
“The Cape Town City Bowl is surrounded by unparalleled natural beauty and it is essential to ensure that our environment is properly managed and protected.
“We must, however, recognise the growing pressures facing us with increasing urban populations and therefore it is important that we have the tools to balance the complex demands of the modern city.”

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

Demolition of 139 Victoria Road

From: "Johan Cornelius"
Subject: COMMENT FROM THE CBRRA

Date: 05 May 2016 at 3:08:23 PM SAST
To: "'Chris Willemse'"
Cc: "'Roelof Delport'" , "'Neil Moir'"

Dear Chris

I trust that my e-mail will find you well.

I was approach to assist with an application to have a building at 139 Victoria Road demolished and the Camps Bay Residents & Ratepayer Association is registered with HWC as the heritage body of the area.  Will you please peruse the attached report and provide me with your association’s comment as soon as possible.

The building appears to have no heritage significance but your comment is essential and it will be appreciated if I can receive at your earliest convenience.

Best regards.

Johan Cornelius



–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––


From: John Powell
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 5:16 PM
To: Chris Willemse; Eban Tucker; Neil Gardner; Richard Bendel; Alma Horn; Johan van Papendorp; Gus Millner; Byron Herbert; Michael Smorenburg; Brenda Herbert; Helet Merkling
Subject: Re: COMMENT FROM THE CBRRA
Hi Chris,

I am in receipt of a copy of the application for permission to demolish the existing residence at 139 Victoria Road, Camps Bay, Cape which was constructed in the late1930s.

This property was previously owned by relatives of mine, all of whom currently live overseas, who, if they presently lived in South Africa would have submitted an identical application to enable them to redevelop this most attractive erf.  Any such a redevelopment within the existing zoning scheme regulations will considerably enhance the built environment in this area of Camps Bay.

I cannot see why this application should be refused and accordingly support it.

Kind regards,

John Powell
Past member CBRRA management committee.


–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––


On 2016/05/09 10:09 AM, "CBRRA - Byron Herbert" > wrote:
Hi John

Personally I think this property should not become another concrete mass, and it has significant heritage value, so I do not support its demolition.

Regards
Byron


–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

From: John Powell
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:00 AM
To: CBRRA - Byron Herbert; 'Chris Willemse'; 'Eban Tucker'; 'Neil Gardner'; 'Richard Bendel'; 'Alma Horn'; 'Johan van Papendorp'; 'Gus Millner'; 'Michael Smorenburg'; 'Brenda Herbert'; 'Helet Merkling'
Subject: Re: Barley Bay Demolition - 139 Victoria Road

Hi Byron,

The existing residence was owner-built by Kay’s uncle, Tommy Raaff, in the late1930s and designed by an architect bachelor friend who lived in it upstairs for 40 years (as an illegal double dwelling !) until he died.

Thereafter it was the Raaff family residence until a few years ago.

It has absolutely no historical, heritage and definitely no architectural value whatsoever and currently detracts from the surrounding built environment which will be considerably enhanced once it has been replaced hopefully like the Gregs did recently next door.

Cheers,

John



–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Begin forwarded message:
From: "CBRRA - Byron Herbert"
Subject: Barley Bay Demolition - 139 Victoria Road (not supported)
Date: 10 May 2016 at 10:23:51 AM SAST
To: Various

Hi John

I totally disagree, and have stated my point that Barley Bay is losing its charm whilst becoming wall to wall concrete. The idea of 50% coverage and a 10m (now 9m) height restriction was to retain the green elements within the suburb, but this has somehow been transformed in Barley Bay into boundary to boundary concrete, which is exactly what Camps Bay doesn’t need.

Anyway, neither you nor I will make the final decision, and as you have a vested interest, even if you where still a member of the CBRRA Manco, you would need to recuse yourself.

Therefore in fairness to due process I suggest you step back and let the new owners deal with the various parties including CBRRA independently, and in that way nobody can accuse you of interfering.

Regards
Byron Herbert


–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––


Begin forwarded message:
From: "Johan van Papendorp" 
Subject: RE: Barley Bay Demolition - 139 Victoria Road
Date: 10 May 2016 at 10:22:24 AM SAST
To: Various

Hi Chris and All,
I fully agree with John's comments on the heritage value of the house at 139 Victoria Road.
There is clearly no architectural merit that can prevent  the demolition of the house.
Regards
Johan van Papendorp


–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Begin forwarded message:
From: John Powell 
Subject: Re: Barley Bay Demolition - 139 Victoria Road (not supported)
Date: 10 May 2016 at 2:09:50 PM SAST
To: Various

Hi Byron, 

I really do not wish to make a mountain out of a molehill here.  

I find your last two sentences in your today’s email to me completely unacceptable. 

I have no idea who bought the property from my relatives and neither do I know to whom the original purchasers sold on to. I have not met either party.

So to accuse me of having a vested interest and interfering is way off the mark.  

Chris Willemse sent me a completely detailed copy of the application and I responded in the spirit of assisting CBRRA in its response.  No interfering here.

Johan Van Papendorp, the most qualified of all in CBRRA Mancom in this matter, agrees fully with me – so please rather argue with him. 

Please do not address any further letters on this subject to me as I will not be opening them. 

I am more than happy to have nothing more to do with CBRRA if that is its wish. 

John

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chris Willemse
Date: Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: COMMENT FROM THE CBRRA
To: Johan Cornelius
Cc: Roelof Delport , Neil Moir , David Whitehead , Johan van Papendorp


Hi Johan

Herewith the CBRRA’s letter of no objection for your attention.

Cheers

Chris Willemse




                                                                                                                        15 MAY 2016


Heritage Western Cape (Heritage Officer)
Department of Cultural Affairs and Sport
3rd Floor, Protea Assurance Building
Greenmarket
Square Cape Town 8000
Dear Sir/Madam

ERVEN 101 & 102 CAMPS BAY, 139 VICTORIA RD
The CBRRA has no objection to the demolition of the dwelling house on the abovementioned erven, as per the report submitted by Johan Cornelius Architect & Heritage Consultant

Regards

Chris Willemse
Chair CBRRA

cnwillemse@gmail.com       cell: 0836536363


  

Friday, 6 May 2016

INVITATION to attend Enel Energy SA Launch, 17 May

From: Faith Raubenheimer
Date: Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:25 PM
Subject: INVITATION to attend Enel Energy SA Launch, 17 May
To: cnwillemse@gmail.com


Good afternoon Chris,

I hope this email finds you well and that you’ve had a great week thus far.
Enel Energy South Africa will be launching to an exclusive group of highly influential and aspirational guests on 17 May 2016 at East City Studios in Cape Town, and I would love to invite you to the unveiling of Enel’s innovative products and solutions for households and small businesses.
Can you please forward the invitation to them?

Enel is a leading global energy provider, with a vested interest in alternative power and creating homes of the future. Enel Energy South Africa is an Enel Group company dedicated to South African families and businesses who recognise the potential of modern, alternative energy production methods.

Our event is designed to inform, educate and showcase what Enel can offer you and your clients, as well as give you the opportunity to network and connect with guests within your industry.

Your invitation is attached.
Please let me know if you are able to attend with your partners on 17 May 2016.
If any of your fellow Camps Bay Rate Payers Association members would be interested in attending, do please let me know. I would be happy to extend the invite to them as well.

I look forward to hearing from you,
Faith




Wednesday, 20 April 2016

CCT: Strategic Approach to City Development

From: Demetri Qually 
Sent: 20 April 2016 11:04 AM
To: Vivienne Sasman
Subject: text to include in email of presentation distribution 

Greetings to the Community Organisation in SC16

The Deputy Executive Mayor’s gave a presentation in the Good Hope subcouncil chamber on the Strategic Approach to City Development on Tuesday 19th April to which community organisations were invited.

The presentation gives a useful insight into the City’s thinking which directed the development of its priorities and budget. 

Those who attended the presentation found it very worthwhile, that it gave much greater clarity on the issues and challenges facing the municipality and a context to the tabled budget. They have asked for a copy of the presentation.

We have decided to extend the distribution of the presentation to all community organisations on our database as well as our ward committee members. Although missing the Deputy Mayor’s further explanations and answers to questions, we believe you will also find the PowerPoint presentation informative and helpful.

Regards

Alderman Demetri Qually
Chairperson – Good Hope Subcouncil


Tel 021 487 2001 
Cell 083 629 1326
Fax 086 576 0582 

11th floor 44 Wale Street, Cape Town