ANNOUNCEMENTS

ACHIEVEMENTS what CBCRA do in the community
BECOME A MEMBER and raise the level of community spirit
SEND US your suggestions and comments
READ MORE about City of Cape Town’s activities & policies
FAULT REPORT system introduced by the City Council
VISIT Property Valuations for more details about your CV22

Friday, 20 July 2018

Cyclist snared

Cyclists say someone has been setting traps across trails.


A wire trap which appears to have been deliberately set for cyclists on the Glen trail has left one Camps Bay cyclist injured.
Harry Millar was snagged by a wire which had been maliciously stretched across the path at neck-height on July 7.
This has angered the cycling community who think the culprits may be those who have a sense of entitlement over the trails and do not want to share them with cyclists.
“A discussion with the culprit will simply not be enough, we will make an example of him,” said Table Mountain Bikers founder, Robert Vogel.
Mr Millar sustained injuries that has left him suffering to swallow.
Mr Vogel said cyclists in Cape Town are being targeted by a suspect who places wire traps to ambush cyclists and this was not the first time an incident like this has taken place.
“The first time this happened, I personally caught the culprit and it’s definitely one of the people who have a problem with cyclists in the Glen trails. Last year the culprits dragged logs and other obstacles onto the trail,” he said.
He said cyclists were now legally allowed to ride on the trails and some people feel their space has been taken away.
“This is serious, the victim sustained injuries but it could’ve been a lot worse, you can tell that this was planned and the culprit went to a lot of trouble to do it,” he
said.
Mr Vogel said no one owns the trails and they must be shared by all residents. He said people who were unhappy with cyclists on trails should be voicing their unhappiness on the right platforms instead of resorting to violence.
He said they didn’t understand why someone would go out of their way to deliberately hurt others.
He said Table Mountain Bikers also paid for the maintenance of the trails and vowed that they would take legal steps on the matter.
Another Camps Bay cyclist using the trails, Ricky Lawrence, said since the incident happened, he’s been nervous to ride there.
“Hikers are grumpy when it comes to sharing the trails, but I find it hard that one would do that during the day, it could’ve been two naughty guys who were up to no good,” he said.
Some residents commented on social media that the incident was intentional with an aim to cause an injury and the culprit needed to be taught a lesson.
The hike leader of the Peninsula Ramblers hiking club, Glenda Dollar, said the person who did this was driven by malicious intent.
Ms Dollar said: “I saw on social media that people think it could be hikers and I can’t believe that people would think that about hikers. We never had a problem with sharing the trails with cyclists.”
Mr Vogel said they believed that the culprit is from the Camps Bay area and the Table Mountain rangers were currently doing patrols in the area.
They urged the community to help identify the culprit.
Camps Bay SAPS station commander, Captain Keith Chandler, said the police went to the crime scene and found a wire and a thick rope but no arrests had been made.
Mandated with managing the environmental integrity of the Table Mountain National Park (TMNP), SANParks is the managing authority of the TMNP and as such is the ultimate decision making authority within the boundaries of the national park. It has legislative power to establish rules regarding all activities within the TMNP. It’s responsible for among other things, monitoring activities, maintaining the designated routes and closing illegal or non-approved routes.
Atlantic Sun tried to reach SANParks on the matter, to no avail.
At least one cyclist was injured when a wire trap snagged his neck.
By
 SINAZO MKOKOhttps://www.atlanticsun.co.za/news/cyclist-snared-16152541

Tuesday, 10 July 2018

Bo-Kaap Interdicted For Protesting For Their Community

Bo-kaap in the old Malay quarter of Cape Town South Africa with Signal Hill behind the colorful homes just before sunset

The Bo-Kaap community was interdicted by one of the developers who are seeking to gentrify the community. On July 4, the Blok Urban Living company filed an interdict against various Bo-Kaap community associations as well as the City of Cape Town. The interdict was regarding alleged trespassing by Bo-Kaap residents over a development in the area. The Daily Vox team rounds up.
On Friday, the Western Cape High Court granted the development company the interdict against all other persons trespassing, unlawfully conducting themselves or attempting to trespass or unlawfully conduct themselves.
Osman Shabodien from the Bo-Kaap Civic Association told The Daily Vox in an interview that: The interdict was given last Wednesday and the community moving forward is basically we went to court where the interim interdict was granted. The rest must be contested by the 15 or 17th of August.
The judge ordered that a meeting must take place between the Blok Company, Bo-Kaap representative Sheik Dawood Terblanche and the South African Human Rights Commission within the next 10 days.
On Monday, July 9 the community held a meeting to discuss the interdict and the way forward.
Shabodien said: “What we basically decided last night at the meeting was the question of us looking at a way forward by telling ourselves listen we can’t be sitting in this position purely because the court’s order makes it obligatory for us to do certain things. Like from the interdict we got two reps from the community that now have to liaise with the builders and developers in order to make our day-to-day lives easier. Like the noise. The whole question of jamming up our roads, of heavy vehicles. So it’s quite a disturbance in our community so that's the one thing the two reps must do. They are ordered by court to do that. But we are saying going forward is we must be able to match them legally. Like taking to court and saying listen this is now enough.”
With regards to the meeting with the company and the SAHRC, Shabodien said: “Well I think last night’s meeting settled. The court has given ten working days so between that and last night’s meeting we laid the basis of how it should happen. The community is very suspicious with the whole idea of talking openly to developers because they might take it as an acceptance of them being around. Our talking to developers has got nothing to with accepting them being around. We still don’t want them around.”
The Bo-Kaap community have been protesting for the past few months over the gentrification and development of their community by the City of Cape Town and private developers.

By Fatima Moosa
 
https://www.thedailyvox.co.za/bo-kaap-interdicted-for-protesting-for-their-community-fatima-moosa/

Thursday, 5 July 2018

New body fights Maiden’s Cove ‘gentrification’


“Developments can happen but not at the cost of reinforcing a divided city which will be economically exclusive to its own residents.”
These are the words of Maiden’s Cove for All (MCA) co-founder, Gary Stewart.
The organisation was established on June 22 with a mission to stop the proposed development of Maiden’s Cove.
MCA believes that the development will exclude economically marginalised residents from across Cape Town from enjoying the natural beauty of Maiden’s Cove.
The City sold the piece of land between Clifton and Camps Bay to private developers in September last year.
Developers plan to build among other things, a hotel and a block of apartments.
In April, the Bungalow Owners’ Association (BOA) filed an application with the Western Cape High Court to have the City’s decision reviewed and set aside.
MCA supports the application and is planning to intervene in BOA’s application.
“We formed this organisation because we couldn’t intervene in the BOA’s application in our individual capacity,” said the member of the NGO, Janey Ball.
Mr Stewart said there seems to be a pattern from the City of letting public open space fall into disrepair and using that as an argument to get the developer to take over the space.
“We find this problematic because it takes away the nature of what makes Cape Town what it is. The Maiden’s Cove is a precious space that is open to everyone and historically been utilised by people of colour.
“The City by either commercialising or gentrifying it, is taking it out of the hands of the broader Cape Town community,” said Mr Stewart.
He said that this was essentially economic apartheid and it would only be accessible by the wealthy.
The organisation said they want a correct public participation process where the City would include the voices of those who use the space.
Mr Stewart said when the City opened a public participation process on the matter, it only approached nearby residents and excluded the historic users across the city.
He said people come from as far as Ceres and Atlantis.
Ms Ball agrees. “The formal public participation process had not broadly included the communities that use the space,” she said.
She said the City called a public meeting at the Civic Centre in September 2015 and invited residents to come and hear the plans for Maiden’s Cove, but because it was a designed vision, people didn’t realise that it was going to the tender document.
“When we speak to the people who actually use the space, they either don’t know about the plans or they think they will get a wonderful coastal urban park,” said Ms Ball.
In its intervention application to an already existing application by BOA, MCA members said they plan to fight for community access and fairness. The organisation said they will fight for the space to remain accessible and open to all of Cape Town and hear what the communities want.
They said with the assistance of human rights activist and former Constitutional Court Judge Albie Sachs as the group’s patron, they’re hopeful.
An attorney representing the BOA, Richard Summers, said any initiatives by concerned groups, communities or citizens to engage in evaluating the merits of the City’s decisions regarding the Maiden’s Cove site were welcomed.
“Any involvement that highlights the broader public interest at stake in this case is important.
“It is critical that the broader public and the communities that have historically used the site appreciate the significance in the City’s decisions,” said Mr
Summers.
He said the entire decision-making process relating to the Maiden’s Cove site appeared to have been rushed and, as a result, several issues were not considered in appropriate detail.
He said the City’s decision to privatise and develop a Provincial Heritage Site and part of the coastline ought to be of serious interest to concerned members of the public.
The fight for Maiden’s Cove will remind many residents of another civic battle not too long ago to save the Sea Point promenade from development.
It was one Ms Ball was all too familiar with being among the people at the forefront of the Seafront for All (Seafa) campaign to prevent the luxury development from going ahead and robbing residents from across Cape Town of a prime space for leisure.
Millions of rands later, the plans were finally dumped in 2012.
By
 SINAZO MKOKOhttps://www.atlanticsun.co.za/news/new-body-fights-maidens-cove-gentrification-15828077

Friday, 29 June 2018

Camps Bay Bowling Club Evicted



https://www.atlanticsun.co.za/news/club-evicted-15717268

 

Thursday, 28 June 2018

MyCiTi bus driver hailed a hero

From left, are Steve and Sharon Russak, Siphelo Maqubela and mayoral committee member for transport and urban development, Brett Herron at the hand- over of a certificate of gratitude to Sipelo Maqubela on Wednesday June 20.
MyCiTi bus driver Siphelo Maqubela is Sea Point resident Sharon Russak’s hero for finding and returning her purse which contained her jewellery, including her diamond wedding ring and earrings, as well as cash, credit cards, her driver’s licence and her identity document.
Ms Russak had accidentally dropped her purse when she got out of her car on Main Road, Sea Point around 5pm on Monday June 11. Mr Maqubela, who was on duty driving the 108 route from Hout Bay along Sea Point Main Road to the CBD, noticed the purse lying on the ground next to a parked car and decided to stop the bus and pick it up.
“I didn’t open the purse immediately, I continued with my route and when I eventually opened it and saw the jewellery, I actually became scared and knew I had to return it to the owner,” said Mr Maqubela.
Mr Maqubela said he does not have Facebook so he asked one of his passengers to try and find the owner on Facebook using her name from the ID.
The passenger then messaged her via Facebook to let her know that her purse had been found and she needed to contact Mr Maqubela.
Ms Russak at the time had not realised that her purse was gone. “After my appointment, I saw a Facebook message to please contact someone with regard to my purse. At first I thought maybe I was somehow pick-pocketed because how could a bus driver have my purse,” she said.
Ms Russak’s husband Steve then made contact with Mr Maqubela and they arranged to meet each other at the MyCiTi bus stop in Camps Bay, as Mr Maqubela was making his way back to Hout Bay.
“He returned the full contents of my purse but, most importantly my diamond wedding ring, another ring and valuable earrings, which are of sentimental value to me. Siphelo, thank you, thank you and bless you for your honesty,” said Ms Russak.
On Wednesday June 20, mayoral committee member for transport and urban development, Councillor Brett Herron, handed over a certificate of gratitude to Mr Maqubela at the Civic Centre MyCiTi station. At the handover, Ms Russak said her husband was initially upset when he heard that she had lost her purse because it contained her wedding ring.
The couple have been married for 23 years laughed when Mr Maqubela jokingly told them he saved their marriage. “I like to help people. I always ensure that I return people’s belongings to them. Our passengers need to… know they can trust us,” he said.
By Atlantic Sun
https://www.atlanticsun.co.za/news/myciti-bus-driver-hailed-a-hero-15717277

Thursday, 21 June 2018

Court rules against City - 96 Camps Bay Drive

Brett Herron. Picture: Jason Boud/African News Agency (ANA)

The Western Cape High Court has ruled in favour of the application by the Camps Bay and Clifton Ratepayers’ Association (CBCRA) to have reviewed and set aside, a decision by the City to remove title deed restrictions applicable to 96 Camps Bay Drive and approve plans for a block of four apartments.
In his report, delivered at a public meeting of the CBCRA on May 7, chairperson Chris Willemse, explained that the erf was zoned GR2, which allowed for multiple dwellings and taller buildings. The title deed restrictions, however, did not allow for this type of development.
Mr Willemse explained that in 2015 existing legislation had changed, with the enactment of the Spatial and Land Use Management Act (SPLUMA) at national level, Land Use Planning Act (LUPA) at provincial level and the Municipal Planning By-Law (MPB) at local level.
The Removal of Restrictions Act was repealed and planning decisions at local level devolved upon a Municipal Planning Tribunal (MPT). Mr Willemse accused the City, its planners and those in private practice, of exploiting the situation by entertaining applications that removed all relevant title deed restrictions from the deed, allowing single dwellings to be converted into multiple units.
The argument from the City and the MPT was that all case law protecting property rights fell away with the new laws and that they had total discretionary powers in deciding such matters. CBCRA disagreed.
Mr Willemse said the MPT had rejected all the objections from the CBCRA and surrounding neighbours, and approved the development. The CBCRA then lodged an appeal with Mayor Patricia de Lille, but she dismissed their appeal in July last year.
“By this stage, inexplicably, the developer was already busy with construction on site,” said Mr Willemse.
It was then that the CBCRA filed an application before the Western Cape High Court to review and set aside the MPT’s decision, the City’s dismissal of the appeal and the planning approval, on November 18 last year. This initial application by the CBCRA for an urgent interdict was set down for November 22, but was postponed at the request of the developer.
The matter was heard by the High Court on Monday June 18, with Judge Siraj Desai ruling in CBCRA’s favour.
Mr Willemse said the City had submitted to the court that the CBCRA should pay the City’s costs, on the basis that the CBCRA had insisted that the matter be heard rather than being settled, but the counsel for the City could not explain why it had failed to file its notice to abide by the decision of the court until late April 2018.
The City was ordered to pay CBCRA’s costs incurred in bringing the application and the developer, Schaefer Partnership, was ordered to pay its own costs.
“In our opinion, this is damning of the conduct of the City, as, usually, costs are borne jointly and severally by all parties on the losing side. It has been established by the court that the City is entirely responsible for the whole mess. Will they hold anyone accountable or will they simply continue with business as usual?” asked Mr Willemse.
The City’s mayoral committee member for transport and urban development, Brett Herron said: “All parties involved in this matter agreed that this decision should be set aside and the City notes the order relating to costs.”
The director of the Schaefer Partnership, Friedrich Schaefer, declined to comment on the matter.

Sinazo Mkoko

_____________________________________________________________________________

NOTES FROM AN INTERVIEW WITH CHRIS WILLEMSE

In the Western Cape High Court this morning, 19 June 2018, Mr Justice Siraj Desai found in favour of the CBCRA’s application to have the decision by the City of Cape Town, to remove title deed restrictions applicable to 96 Camps Bay Drive and approve plans for a block of 4 apartments, reviewed and set aside. Therefore the current construction on this site is without approved plans and construction must cease.

The Judge further ordered that the City pay the legal costs of the CBCRA and that the developer, the Schaefer Partnership of Camps Bay, pay its own costs.
This costs order goes to the degree of culpability of the City in its deficient planning approval process - something that the CBCRA has complained of for many years and which the DA-led administration simply ignores.

Some questions posted to Chris Willemse, chair of the CBCRA, from Sinazo Mkoko, Reporter - Atlantic Sun:

1. The matter was first heard in court on May 28, 2018 and the ruling was delivered today the 18th of June?

- No, the matter was heard and decided on the same day. Judge Desai was not interested in hearing argument in the matter as it was common cause that the City’s application and planning approval process was fatally flawed. He only wanted to settle the issue of costs. The initial application by the CBCRA for an urgent interdict was set down for 22 Nov 2017 but postponed at the request of the developer. By agreement, the postponed case would then be heard in late February as an expedited review case, with certain guarantees put in place that would not allow the developer to claim prejudice for work completed after this date, if the review was successful. This might sound quite mundane, but developers always claim that they have suffered severe prejudice of the cost of completed work if their plans are set aside at a later date. In any event, due to the unavailability of a judge and then other legal delays, the matter came before the court yesterday.

2. The application was filed after the MPT rejected objections from CBCRA and the Association appealed to the City's mayor which was declined?

- Yes. The MPT decided in favour of the application on 6 Dec 2016 and the CBCRA subsequently appealed this decision to the Executive Mayor of Cape Town. After an incredible initial mismanagement of the appeal process, the mayor dismissed the CBCRA appeal in late July 2017. By this stage, inexplicably, the developer was already busy with construction on site.

3. Please assist with the exact dates when this application was filed?

- After initial representations to the developer, and appeals to the City, were rebuffed, the CBCRA filed its application for the review and setting aside of the MPT’s decision, the Mayor’s dismissal of the appeal and the planning approval before the WC High Court on 18 Nov 2017, for an urgent hearing on the 22 Nov 2017.

4.  Reading through your report at the last public meeting, you were confident that you were going to win this case?

- Of course, it is never wise to first-guess the outcome of any case involving planning matters. However, the City planners had made so many fundamental procedural errors in the processing of the application - all in favour of the developer - and shown what the CBCRA considered incredible bias against the community in dealing with the application, that it did seem very likely that the court would grant the relief sought by the CBCRA. I must also add here that Ms Lana Stacey, an affected neighbour, took the responsibility of standing up for her rights and joined the application as a co-applicant. The CBCRA is indeed very grateful for her support and willingness to be involved in a matter that affects all ratepayers in Camps Bay - and, by implication, the ratepayers of Cape Town.

5. I understand you're briefing the association about the ruling today, how are the members taking it?

- Obviously, the members that have been briefed are both satisfied with the ruling and relieved that this is over. That the City is happy to force its ratepayers into continuous litigation to defend their rights is iniquitous.

6. Also, do you have an online link to the exact ruling by Judge Desai?  It would be great to quote him.

- Three points to bear in mind:
The City will, in all likelihood, claim that this was just a minor technical oversight and that the review was based on a narrow procedural point. They would then be ignoring the voluminous set of papers citing chapter and verse of the shortcomings and bias of the City planners, which the City has refused to argue against in open court.
Then there are the merits of the case and the fact that this DA-led administration is quite content to expropriate citizens rights without compensation or agreement. Restrictive title deed conditions have been held by all divisions of the high Court of South Africa as praedial servitudinal rights and are, in effect, real property rights.
So it is quite bizarre that the political party, the DA, fighting all others against the introduction of EWC in the country, is completely in favour of such expropriation when it suits its agenda of development at any/all costs in the city of Cape Town!

Friday, 1 June 2018

Public Safety & Security Meeting 5 June 2019

PUBLIC SAFETY & SECURITY MEETING

5 June 2018 @ 18h30
at The Rotunda (Bay Hotel) 

 
Play YOUR role in Shaping Camps Bay’s Crime Solutions

Topics Include:
•  Vagrancy & Criminal Street Gangs – 20 min
•  Car Guards vs Paid-for-Parking – 15 min
•  Alien Vegetation / Bush Clearance – 10 min
•  Crime Update, Analysis & Ops Feedback – 20 min
•  CID / SRA / SLA – 20 min


ATTEND – BE INFORMED – MAKE A DIFFERENCE
 
Thank you for your much-needed support - hope to see you all there

Yours in Community Policing

Bernard Schäfer
083 3003 380
Chair : Camps Bay Community Police Forum
Ops. Commander: CB Community Safety & Security
Chair : Cape Town Cluster Community Police Board

Find Out More