-->
A special welcome to our guest speaker
tonight, Jaco Boshoff of the Iziko Museum. Also welcome to our local ward
councillor, Shayne Ramsay. She will give a short address tonight but maybe it
should be more of an opportunity for you to address her on issues that are of
concern to you, the ratepayers of Camps Bay.
Tonight
we give you a report back on the various matters that are being dealt with by
your Association and also hear Jaco Boshoff’s fascinating research into the slave
ship shipwreck off Clifton, many years ago.
So,
please let me introduce you to Jaco Boshoff, who will enlighten you with an
interesting piece of history, that still has social consequences, that occurred
on our own beach.
Shayne Ramsey – councillor’s report
Byron Herbert -
MOP on Camps Bay beach
Chair’s report
The
suburbs of Camps Bay and Clifton are seriously under threat by the City of Cape
Town on 3 fronts at the moment:
The
first is the Maidens Cove development.
This prime piece of relatively unspoilt public open space, which also has huge
socio-historical value, was sold off to a private developer for just over R1b
at the end of last year.
This
despite the fact that there was complete opposition to this development by
Capetonians from Camps Bay to Mitchells Plain and from Scarborough to Belhar.
By
law, the City had to provide public participation meetings on the proposed
development. This it did, but having attended all the meetings, it was clear
that the City was ticking the boxes again and not actually paying any attention
to the opinions and sentiments of the people of Cape Town. Sadly, the civics of
Cape Town – including the CBCRA – are used to this. When it comes to serving
its friends in the development industry, the DA-led City has no interest in the
ratepayers of Cape Town. And you will hear this from far and wide: For
instance, the group attempting to stop de Lille and her cabal from expropriating
the Philippi Horticultural Area for housing, will tell of a 10-year battle for
sanity vs greed.
This
area produces over 55% of Cape Town’s fresh supply of vegetables. The Cape
Flats Aquifer, which lies under this area and is an incredibly important water
resource, will also be negatively affected by development. The Bo-Kaap has
major problems with the City planners, as does the Deep South areas like
Kommetjie and Noordhoek.
However,
there is good news. The Clifton Bungalow Owners Association has lodged an
application with the Western Cape High Court to have this decision reviewed and
set aside.
That
Association has submitted a voluminous application and has raised many strong
points, especially the environmental issue that this is a proclaimed scenic
reserve, protected by law.
I
think that it is imperative that we support the CBOA in this matter but
obviously we need to be suitably funded to do so.
I
would like this meeting to mandate the CBCRA to pursue the matter of the
Maidens Cove development with a view to stopping it.
Byron
has already given you the background on the MOP, which is the second threat to our community. The fact that the
City is happy to dump millions of litres of raw effluent into Marine Protected
Bay area is unconscionable. Besides the
immediate health hazard, there are very sinister long-term affects that will
haunt future generations.
Not
only that, but the City stealthily tries to over-densify Camps Bay at the same
– with no increase in infrastructure such as sewerage, electricity and roads!
This is simply disgraceful.
And
this brings us to the third threat: The development at 96 Camps Bay Drive.
This
has been raised at our previous meeting but a bit of history to bring all up to
speed:
This
erf is zoned GR2, as are many erven in Camps Bay, which allows for multiple
dwellings and taller buildings. However, the title deed restrictions do not
allow for this type of development.
Up
until now, the many court cases to establish and maintain the praedial servitutal nature of these
restrictions, that have been fought and won by this Association in particular,
and many others in general have kept the lid on this type of over-densification.
Then
in 2015, planning legislation changed in the country with the the enactment of
SPLUMA, at national level, LUPA at provincial level and the MPB at local level.
At
the same time, the Removal of Restrictions Act was repealed and planning
decisions at local level devolved upon something called a municipal planning
tribunal. This is effectively, a tribunal of private planning professional
appointed by the executive mayor and paid for by the City.
It
didn’t take long before the City and its planners, and those in private
practice, started exploiting the situation by entertaining applications that
removed all relevant title deed restrictions from the deeds thus allowing
single dwellings to be converted into multiple units.
The
argument from the City and the MPT is that all case law protecting property
rights fell away with the new laws and they had total discretionary powers in
deciding such matters.
However,
the CBCRA strongly disagreed and was closely tracking the first case of this
kind, the one at 96 Camps Bay Drive.
Basically,
the MPT rejected all the objections from the CBCRA and surrounding neighbours
and approved the development. We appealed that decision to Mayor de Lille and,
unsurprisingly, this appeal was refused. You have to understand that planning
decisions by this administration are very predictable and always in favour of
developers at any cost. But it is important – and a legal requirement – that an
aggrieved party exhausts all administrative options before taking a matter
before a court of law. So we, too, tick boxes.
The
CBCRA filed an application with the Western Cape High Court to review and set
aside the MPT decision and de Lille’s rejection of our appeal.
In
this matter, the CBCRA is represented by Adv Deon Irish SC, Adv Dale Lubbe and
our attorney is Leon van Rensburg. This is a very formidable legal team.
The
matter has been set down for hearing on the 28th May 2018.
So
far, the City, after initially strongly opposing the application, have folded
and agreed to abide by the decision of the court. The developer, now basically
up the creek with the City’s withdrawal, is trying to settle but not pay costs.
The
CBCRA is not interested in anything but a High Court ruling which sets out
clearly how such matters must be dealt with and whether the City has the right
to remove or amend our constitutional property rights as enshrined in the
Constitution.
If
you look at the Zoning map on the screen, you will quickly realize that if we
don’t win this case, then Camps Bay is doomed. Given the number of GR2 erven,
Camps Bay could densify by at least 5 or 6 times in the next few years.
The
developers are licking their lips and the City cannot wait for all the rates to
come in! And from the City’s point of view, the current services can easily
manage this – so no expense for it. Maybe we should take the Mayor (if she
still is) and the senior DA politicians for a walk in Hove Road when it
experiences its regular sewerage overflow – or maybe the Little Glen when the raw
sewerage flows down the embankments into the Blinkwater River.
In
any event, all the court documents are on the CBCRA website for those who wish
to read through about 2000 pages of legal argument!
We
will also update the site regarding progress in this matter.
As
a final note on this court case, the MPT is not making any decisions on title
deed restrictions until the case is settled. This after the CBCRA pointed out
to it that it would be unethical, if not irregular, to make decisions that it
knew to be compromised.
Planning
I
would just like to alert you to a few issues that will be of interest:
Firstly,
all applications that are received by this Association will be advertised (or
posted) on the BlogSpot, added to that, all letters of objection or support by
the CBCRA will also be posted.
So,
visit the site regularly and keep up to date with what is being planned for Camps
Bay. If you know of an application that isn’t posted on the blog, please advise
us immediately – as we are meant to receive all Camps Bay, Clifton and Bakoven
planning applications from the City.
There
are many applications so one needs to be watchful.
We
had a very concerning occurrence a few months back: Contractors erected a large
Telkom cellphone mast on the property of the service station in Rontree Ave.
It
was done unannounced and without any planning permission, based on Telkom’s
contention that, as a SOE, they didn’t require permission.
The
neighbours were outraged and lead by the immediate neighbour – and with the
support of the CBCRA – a case was brought against Telkom. All went quiet for a
while and then, as quickly as it went up, it was taken down.
This
is clearly a great victory for the community but also underlines the constant
threat that communitys’ face on a daily basis. Not to mention the costs
involved in standing up for your rights against organs of state and local
authorities that are shameless in spending our tax money on their fantasies.
No comments:
Post a Comment